“Since you are a white devil would you consider being vetted as a white nationalist?”
-Ben
I just finished answering this question at arrogant, obnoxious, length within a self-censored book, and there is no way I'm laying that out here.
In short, since I am not a joiner, I would never seek to be vetted for anything.
I live according to an honor code among my associates, who I associate with freely, regardless of race, creed, gender or breed.
Now, if I were of a mind to join a Whiteman's club, I could only imagine what the vetting would consists of. However, I bet it is based on feminine pecking orders that seek likeminded members rather than able individuals, only because everything in our sissy society seems to be based on how girls do things in high school—and the only thing in high school I thought was worth doing was a girl....
Obviously, white nationalists, like black nationalists, are organized for the preservation of the said race and attendant culture. I think both groups are prudent in there formation, as those who run this world want to eradicate all historical races and crossbreed us into one golden slave race.
But as a man, and these fraternities seem to exclude women [and, if they do, rightfully so] to think that a bunch of 30-something suburban thinkers could bar me entry into a group, which basis is our shared race, when I suspect that I have fought more black men, faced more ebon thugs on dark streets than all white nationalists combined, faced down a mob of black thugs over a shotgun barrel and have chased feral dindus down the streets of my city when other white men stood idly by, could only be an insult, even if I were accepted into such a race-based fraternity.
There is a problem that loss of identity among men creates, which is a mania to recreate this identity before we recreate men. Before joining any such group, if I were a of a mind to join, I would first vet them by making sure all the young men who would judge my character first faced me in combat. Only then could I know if this group consisted of men who were worth joining, because, ultimately I am joining with them and their idea, not just the idea.
Thriving in Bad Places
Kindle Edition
link › jameslafond.blogspot.com
"...There is a problem that loss of identity among men creates, which is a mania to recreate this identity before we recreate men..."
No offense meant James but I believe most Men need the group to shape identity. You're the odd one out on this that's the opposite.
Most people respond to peer pressure where you either react or create the pressure.
You are certainly right about me being the odd ball here. But consider that those folks with the strongest identity before quality alignments, outlaw bikers, ebony urbanites and cops almost always require over whelming numbers to be effective in combat.
So, should a racial group which is a tiny global minority and seemingly on its way to becoming a minority in the few places it calls home rely on numbers first or quality first? One comes before the other.
Have you eve seen what happens to cops, ebon warriors and bikers when they are outnumbered?
Being part of a big group would be really great if it had quality too. But thinking that membership makes you quality, I'm suspicious of that.
Don't know how it is in america but here in sweden the white nationalists are mostly very obese men who can't fight their way out of a paper bag.
I would rather have a collegue (carpenter) besides me in a fight than some faɡɡoty biker
Dunbar's number will be painfully relearned by whites. Non-whites have already got it on speed-dial.
Jacob—Soccer hooligans are Europe's last, best hope. Someone needs to point them in the right direction.
shep Soccer hooligans are bloody imbecills and alot of them are leftists
Jacob—I don't disagree, but I recall another group of fellows who matched that description and had a great deal of success for awhile. They were reacting to the same socio-political stimuli, as well.
They wore brown jerseys for both home and away matches, IIRC.