Before we get to the heart of this issue, let us first consider the future growth of the global Muslim population:
According to the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion and Public Life, the world’s Muslim population is projected to increase by 35 percent just by 2030, a rise of 1.6 billion in 2010, to 2.2 billion by 2030. For the next two decades, the Muslim population will grow at almost twice the rate of the non-Muslim population, that is an average annual growth rate of 1.5 percent versus 0.7 percent. On this basis Muslims will constitute 26.4 percent of the world’s population of 8.3 billion in 2030. The growth rate of the Muslim population is slowing down: from 1990 to 2010, it increased at an annual rate of 2.2 percent, and from 2011 to 2030, the projected rate is 1.5 percent. However, this is merely a reduction in the rate of acceleration, and the population still increases, growing, but at a slower rate.
The report says: “Several factors account for the faster projected growth among Muslims than non-Muslims worldwide. Generally, Muslim populations tend to have higher fertility rates (more children per woman) than non-Muslim populations. In addition, a larger share of the Muslim population is in, or soon will enter, the prime reproductive years (ages 15-29). Also, improved health and economic conditions in Muslim-majority countries have led to greater-than-average declines in infant and child mortality rates, and life expectancy is rising even faster in Muslim-majority countries than in other less-developed countries.”
Further, the report does not see the apocalyptic projections made by most of the Alt right, about a coming take over demographically by Muslims of the US and Europe:
“In the United States, for example, the population projections show the number of Muslims more than doubling over the next two decades, rising from 2.6 million in 2010 to 6.2 million in 2030, in large part because of immigration and higher-than-average fertility among Muslims. The Muslim share of the U.S. population (adults and children) is projected to grow from 0.8% in 2010 to 1.7% in 2030, making Muslims roughly as numerous as Jews or Episcopalians are in the United States today. Although several European countries will have substantially higher percentages of Muslims, the United States is projected to have a larger number of Muslims by 2030 than any European countries other than Russia and France….
In Europe as a whole, the Muslim share of the population is expected to grow by nearly one-third over the next 20 years, rising from 6% of the region’s inhabitants in 2010 to 8% in 2030. In absolute numbers, Europe’s Muslim population is projected to grow from 44.1 million in 2010 to 58.2 million in 2030. The greatest increases – driven primarily by continued migration – are likely to occur in Western and Northern Europe, where Muslims will be approaching double-digit percentages of the population in several countries. In the United Kingdom, for example, Muslims are expected to comprise 8.2% of the population in 2030, up from an estimated 4.6% today. In Austria, Muslims are projected to reach 9.3% of the population in 2030, up from 5.7% today; in Sweden, 9.9% (up from 4.9% today); in Belgium, 10.2% (up from 6% today); and in France, 10.3% (up from 7.5% today).”
It is arguable here, the report does not accurately consider the intertwining of other demographic factors, such as the ageing of Europe’s White population, and its below net replacement levels of population:
Even the mainstream media admit that in the longer term, Europe will have a Muslim majority:
Now to the kicker. With the decline of conventional Christianity, in the sense that even in the Third World where Christian numbers are rising, Christianity is being radically transformed to become a Third World non-White religion:
https://www.amazon.com/Next-Christendom-Coming-Christianity-Trilogy/dp/0199767467, what religion, if any should declining, hunted whites adopt?
“Barbarian Christians: Why Islam May Want To Rethink Taking Over Europe”, by Maximus Decimus, is worth discussing. He begins by saying that race is no basis for unifying a people. The qualities instead are values, morals, and worldviews, which assumes that these have no relationship to race, but that is standard for RoK types.
Anyway, cutting to the chase, Christianity no longer works for Western Man, the collapse of Western civilization is right around the corner, and Islam looks like being the winner. But there is a dialectical feedback:
“Here is something to contemplate about any future “victory” for Islam in The West: just like Christianity taking up pagan concepts to become widespread after the collapse of Rome, Islam will be forced to take up Western concepts (secularism, democracy, separation of church and state) as it becomes more widespread and adopted over the course of The West’s (i.e Rome’s) continuing collapse.
Remember: Christianity too was once seen as an invading cult by another long lived and glorious empire with a centuries old religious tradition and world view. Many Roman emperors tried to eradicate it, some more zealous than others. The parallels to Trump’s ban on Muslims and the increasing backlash against Islam in The West should be pretty easy to see to those with an unbiased view of history. I am not betting that history will suddenly change course and chalk up a win for underdog Christianity against invading and militant Islam this time round. It is possible, but the history bookies are placing some very high odds against it.
Islam, for all its claims to be unbending and unyielding to change or reform, is not a monolith. It is a living religion like any other in the past. Islam WILL change with it’s likely takeover of the formerly Christian West.”
Thus, Western men should become Muslims, which would defuse the current immigration crisis, and give us patriarchy to boot, all the RoK values.
The argument is flawed for many reasons, the most basic being that it ignores ethno-racial conflict, which is its starting premise. There is no reason to suppose that there would not be a continuation of the present conflict in the West even with mass conversions parallel to Rome adopting Christianity, because there is more to this conflict than just religion. Islam has had internal conflict within itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_world#List_of_conflicts_in_Muslim_world, with a notable example being the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988). There is no reason to believe that such conflicts would cease in a collapse situation, and would be likely to be greater.
The other assumption made here is that while Islam wins, it will be transformed by a dying liberalism, preserving all those libertarian capitalist things Whites love. However, in a collapse situation, the values listed by Maximus, such as secularism, democracy and separation of church and state, will disappear. Sharia law is already creeping into the Western legal system, transforming it, not being transformed itself: https://aifs.gov.au/publications/family-matters/issue-84/legal-recognition-sharia-law.
For further evidence of this conflict see:
The approach of Maximus is naïve and ill-thought out, typical of the race-blind school. Just ask yourself: has the adoption of Islam by a large portion of the US black population led to less or more ethno-racial conflict? See:
Race does matter:
The situation regarding the survival of Western Man is many times worse than he contemplates, and our fate may well be terminal. This could be our extinction event, and the king will not be returning. It certainly will be world’s end if we travel down his road. It is a high price to pay just so young bucks can get the occasional bonk from their nagging female semen spittoons: