Today’s politically incorrect, highly insensitive presentation is on race mixing. Whhaaaarrr! Did the monitors go off in red alert saying that? Press on regardless, until the black helicopters circle overhead, and all the funny men drop down with pop guns to come and have breakfast.

I have collected a huge fuckin’ folder of recent articles on this, so many in fact, that I regret not writing this sooner, because this is going to be real work stitching this article together. It’s a funny sunny Sunday, and vitamin D is calling, so let’s see if I can dispose of this quickly.

For a scholarly introduction to the political correctness of race mixing see Peter Frost, Fair Women, Dark Men: The Forgotten Roots of Color Prejudice, (cybereditions, 2005), where the title says it all. For a more sober overview: W. B. Provine, “Geneticists and the Biology of Race Crossing,” Science, vol. 182, 1973, pp. 790-796.

I feel the White Christian guilt legacy already rising up inside me, like a form of blood pressure; all those centuries of programming come to bear on an issue like this. You see, it may be ok to have the freedom not to like, say chocolate ice-cream or black shirts, but applying that same choice and freedom to people is a great no-no, because, well, you tell me what is special about people, or even why universalistic morality exists, and how it is supposed to be justified if everything is relative and a social construction? Here is a brief reading guide to “moral nihilism,” the idea that morality/ethics is a social game, lacking objective or even relative truth:

Garner, Richard T.; Bernard Rosen (1967). Moral Philosophy: A Systematic Introduction to Normative Ethics and Meta-ethics, New York: Macmillan.

Joyce, Richard (2001). The Myth of Morality, Cambridge University Press.

Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin.

Shafer-Landau, Russ (2003). Whatever Happened to Good and Evil? Oxford University Press.

Garner, Richard T.; (1994). Beyond Morality. Temple University Press, .

Shafer-Landau, Russ & Terence Cuneo (eds.) (2007). Foundations of Ethics, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2006a). "Moral Skepticism," The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). (link)

Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2006b). Moral Skepticisms, Oxford University Press.

van Roojen, Mark (2004). "Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism," The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

If this is so, there is nothing “wrong” with favouring one’s own kind, because there is nothing in the world corresponding to right and wrong. Game fuckin’ over. People have interests that may be satisfied or frustrated, but the moral game is just a social convention. Goodbye Christian liberal guilt complex and stupid universalistic morality. It feels as good as having a bowel movement after two thousand years of spiritual constipation.

The State of Israel often comes under criticism for banning those not considered Jewish from marrying, with those few liberals who criticize this saying that it is “discriminatory.”

Yes, Israel’s marriage laws are discriminatory: , and according to the liberals, “racist” to boot:

Worse still, miscegenation may be regarded as “treason.” .

But, so what? If an ethnostate or a tribe of people see that such measures are necessary for group protection, even if such beliefs are only of a socially constructed and relative nature, which, we are told, everything is, then there can be no objective criticism of such practices. And, on the “sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander” principle, the same must apply to other peoples and tribes. That is the sheer joy of social relativism, the ruling philosophy of this age, which I am suggesting here that we embrace as our new theme song.

Race mixing has had a number of recent discussions, including at this most noble of sites,

as well as from Manosphere and Alt Righters.”

(not so much, this one)

,

and some more conservative pieces from a Jewish traditionalist:

.

These sites give a multitude of objections to race mixing, primarily from a pro-White or Traditionalist perspective. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that Asian cultures have been, and still primarily are, against race mixing, and have held so even when it was popular to maintain that Whites were somehow racially “superior.” They wanted to maintain their identity and held that mixed race children lacked a concrete identity: .

White nationalist types attack White/Black couplings basically because of their critique of Blacks, but these often White supremacists (by contrast to White Relativists, see above), and this: , seldom consider the view point from the other side of the fence: could most Blacks not want to merge with Whites for good reasons of their own?

The great black Muslim boxer Muhammad Ali spoke up against race-mixing on exactly these grounds, namely, that it was a force destroying his people’s identity:

–M.A.: Life is too short for me to be catching hell for something like that, I’d rather be with my own and have a beautiful daughter, beautiful wife; both look like me and we are all happy and I don’t have no trouble. I ain’t that in love with no women to go through all that hell, there’s no one woman that good. You understand?

–Interviewer: I understand, I do understand, I think it’s sad ….

–M.A. (Interrupting) It ain’t sad because I want my child to look like me, every intelligent person wants their child to look like them, I’m sad because I want to blot out my race and lose my identity? Chinese love Chinese they love the little slanty eye, pretty brown skin babies. Pakistani love their culture, Jewish people love their culture, a lot of Catholic wanna be with Catholics and want the religion to stay the same… Who would want to spot up yourself and kill your race? You’re a hater of your people if you don’t want to stay who you are. You ashamed of what God made you? You think he made a mistake when he made you?

–Interviewer: I think that’s a philosophy of despair, I really do.

–M.A. Philosophy of despair? Here let me tell you, listen. No woman on this earth, not even a black woman in Muslim countries can please me and cook for me and socialize with me like my American black woman, no woman, and last is a white woman… can really identify with me and my feelings, and the way I act, and the way I talk…. it’s just nature, you can do what you want, but it’s nature to want to be with your own, I want to be with my own.”

This seems to me to be sensible words of the race issue and worthy of respect and further thought. The Greatest certainly had a way with words, as well, of course, with fists. Oh, the liberals smeared him, a Black, with the “racist’ tag too, so we should never be concerned about being called the same:

As well, many contemporary Black thinkers oppose race mixing for the same reason, seeing larger population groups like Whites, as a genetic threat to their kind. There are masses of YouTube videos along the lines of “Black Race on the Verge of Extinction,” “Extinction of Black People in America,” and so on:

.

There are numerous videos criticizing Black men with White women couplings, mainly by Black women, who savagely attack their men for “race treason,” and the White women for “stealing our men.”

Good for you, girls. This positive bias was dramatically seen in the prosecution of O. J Simpson, where it was assumed by Marcia Clark, that a jury stacked with Black women would identify with blond Nicole Simpson, when in fact, pre-trial research indicated that Black women saw Nicole Simpson as “the enemy,” a beautiful blond who stole a successful black man: .

In short, the critique of multiracialism is not restricted to White Nationalist types, and there are plenty of non-Whites critical of this globalist philosophy. The main critique, as for other species (see J. M. Rhymer and D. Simberloff, “Extinction by Hybridization,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 27, 1996, pp. 83-109), is that it poses an existential threat: because the scale of things, and the pace with which the ethno-racial dispossession is occurring, have never been witnessed in history, with chaotic violence the most likely outcome:

(Apologies to those who don’t like the above site; the alternative was to post a piece in Norwegian.)

In conclusion, the best argument against race mixing is not hate, but love: love of one’s own kind and respect for others to feel the same about their own kind. This took longer than I thought it would take to write, and the twilight of the idols is beginning to fall over the land, with the cold winds of the coming eternal night making their first blast over these wretched lands: