Click to Subscribe
▶  More from Blog Radio Free Dindustan
Doah Soup
And Other Truths of the Unfathomable World with Jeremy Bentham


“Number 24. Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women access to the mainstream of society.”

-Rush Limbaugh’s Undeniable Truths of Life

“Anyone who knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without feminine upheaval. Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position of the fair sex, the ugly ones included.”

-Karl Marx

“The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that, come the Revolution, the journalist herself will be considered hotter-looking.”

- Steve Sailer, Sailer's Law of Female Journalism

“Destroy the Family and you destroy Society.”

- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (1870 - 1924), First Leader of the Soviet Union

“An SDS radical once wrote, “The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.” In other words the cause - whether inner city blacks or women - is never the real cause, but only an occasion to advance the real cause which is the accumulation of power to make the revolution.”

― David Horowitz, Barack Obama's Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model

“The organizer dedicated to changing the life of a particular community must first rub raw the resentments of the people of the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act.”

—Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals (1971) P.116-117

An Interesting take on the subject from John J. Ray.

One should always remember that Feminism is Leftism, first and foremost. So it’s never about liberating women or anybody else. It’s about creating and promoting feelings of grievance. 'Why do slim pretty women get all the attention?’ ‘It’s not fair!’ It’s about fragmenting a society so all the different groups of people who see themselves as aggrieved and oppressed will be duped into handing control of their lives over to the Leftist elite.

Feminism is leading to democide

http://awesternheart.blogspot.com.au/2018/01/feminism-is-leading-to-democide.html#comment-form

THE PSYCHOLOGIST- LIBERTARIAN/CONSERVATIVE DIGEST AND COMMENTARY FROM AN ACADEMIC PSYCHOLOGIST

Murderbowl Update.

Gun store burglaries up 70 percent since 2013. No doubt the stolen pieces of ordnance are going to supply the gang bangers shooting it out in the Murderbowl contender cites.

ATF Releases the Number of Gun Store Thefts in 2017

https://bearingarms.com/erika-h/2018/01/18/2017-gun-store-thefts/?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=

World War Update.

“I think there are many times when it would be most efficient to use nuclear weapons. However, the public opinion in this country and throughout the world throw up their hands in horror when you mention nuclear weapons, just because of the propaganda that's been fed to them.”

-General Curtis “Bombs Away” LeMay

“Pentagon weighs ‘low-yield’ warhead and sea-based cruise missile, igniting debate over strategy”

Low yield warheads? Likely this means that the Government is developing precision guided, ‘smart’ nukes. The more accurate the bomb or missile the less explosive yield you’ll need to ensure destruction of the target. It also gives you a greater ability to avoid collateral damage to civilian communities or friendly forces when taking out enemy military targets in close proximity to same. Like the conventional 250 pound GPS guided Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) the USAF has recently employed with great success in the ‘Stan. Precision nukes would also provide a greater capability to preemptively destroy an enemy’s offensive nuclear capability in the opening stages of a war.

Also many of America’s current nuclear warheads are getting long in the tooth and need to be refurbished and have the old fissionable material replaced to ensure they will produce a nuclear detonation like they are supposed to. It’s always good if potential adversaries remain convinced that America’s nukes will perform as advertised when called upon. Of course if we got rid of all the nukes we could go back to fighting big wars the old-fashioned way, with massed armies of conscripts and vast naval and air fleets, just like back in Dubya Dubya Two

U.S. Plans New Nuclear Weapons

https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-plans-new-nuclear-weapons-1516063059

Pentagon weighs ‘low-yield’ warhead and sea-based cruise missile, igniting debate over strategy

Doah!

Massachusetts couple accidentally donates soup can with hidden savings

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/massachusetts-couple-accidentally-donates-soup-can-with-hidden-savings/ar-AAuYNFS?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

http://jameslafond.blogspot.com/

Books by James LaFond

https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1?ie=UTF8&text=James+LaFond&search-alias=books&field-author=James+LaFond&sort=relevancerank

Add Comment
BobJanuary 24, 2018 3:33 AM UTC

That's a hilarious quote from Horowitz, given neoconservatives' labile relationship with truth, lest it crimp their messianic plans.