The SPLC has gone after Jim Goad for giving Michael Hoofman an interview on white slavery, so don't expect my slavery books to remain on Amazon and kindle for long. Although I don't belong to a group, don't hate anybody and am apolitical, I will surely be scooped up in the coming dragnet, which will make my day.
DNC leader demands Amazon ban books
The vice chairman of the Democratic National Committee is asking Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos to stop the retail giant’s “sale of literature and music published by entities identified as ‘hate groups’ by the Southern Poverty Law Center.” While the letter from U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., later specifies concern about “neo-nazis and white nationalist writers,” […]
www.wnd.com
I think you may be learning the truth of that old saying that: “You may not be interested in War, but War is interested in You.”
Because most books aren't make out of paper any more, you can't have huge book-burning rallies with "The Horst Wessel Song" playing over loudspeakers.
So this is what our wanna-be overlords do instead.
(((SPLC)))! And yes, they're targeting groups. Their entire history is based on hatred and fear of the Other.
Red Ice got dumped by PayPal, as well. Sad, with a newborn baby, and gutting a major payment stream for them—evil really. And what they're doing to you and others.
I know you're not totally averse to taking ideas from the low-rent seats. So, tally ho:
Have you considered shopping your work—if you don't mind that choice of words—to Ron Unz at unz.com. I think he pays. Anyway, your being banned by Amazon is an awesome introduction. His thing is the samizdat press. Yeah, he is more current affairs, but he had Go Ask a Mexican! and still Fred Reed, so no reason why not. I think personally you would be a great addition to his blog roll, but on the other hand, I'm not Ron Unz.
You reminded me—Hoffman was just interviewed on Unz.com by (?),
unz.com/article/whites-in-servitude-in-early-america-and-industrial-britain
Apologies...Hoffman makes a distinction between white slavery in the 17th Century and 18th C, becoming more indentured servitude into the early 19th C. I don't think you make that distinction, being as you could be flogged to death in your seven year term—a distinction without a difference. Maybe he means the slavery became more benign over time?
Thanks for the tip about UNZ.
I just don't submit work to anyone other than Lynn at this point. It helps the writing flow better not havening to target an audience. That's said, if she asks me to write for UNZ and made the connect I would. I just don't spend writing energy attempting to sell my writing. It's purely a creative thing.
I will address the Hoffman point in an article.
Thank you for that too, JR.