I recently viewed an avowed ivory nationalist podcast on a network from which an interview with me was censored. I fully understand why the interview was taken down as I have become an object of corporate censorship and to be associated with my ideas on masculinity is hazardous and I therefore hold no hard feelings, only mention this as a fear marker. When looking into human behavioral patterns I form a mental map of a neighborhood, fraternity, martial arts association, etc., based on the fear markers that pop up. Significantly, on this positive viewing experience, which was mildly humorous and mildly informative, I noted another fear marker.

Of the three speakers, the most entertaining and expressive of the three, a man with actual geographical knowledge of Europe, which is unusual among Americans of all kinds, contributed to the ongoing discussion of how difficult it is to coexist with ebony Americans due to their extreme propensity for violent crime. He used as an analogy a description of a pet owned by a friend, not a dog, but a wolf and that you can tell by a glance at that predatory face that this wolf was an aggression vector, a dangerous creature that could not be taken lightly. He then compared that wolf to ebony men, who, according to him carry a similar latent menace. Actually, the true canine metaphor for the ebon criminal is his chosen pet, the American pitbull, a highly domesticated and hyper-violent product of inbred civilization, not the wolf, a product of nature.

Sadly, the point is well-made, that the majority of ebony Americans are willing to do violence to others for dominance or gain and that a majority of ivory Americans are not even willing to defend themselves, their beliefs or their loved ones at their own peril. Indeed ebony menace and ivory impotence is the meme of our age, well-articulated by Richboy Spencer when he Interviewed Paul Kersey about sports ball and both agreed at Richboy’s urging that ivory men are physically inferior to ebony men. It is an abomination for any race of men to regard themselves as inherently inferior.

This eminent opinion among ivory nationalists, that they need a government to protect them from ebony anarchists, is reprehensible, disgusting and symptomatic of state-sponsored emasculation. In the short term, when a state has declared one race to be combatants and another race to be noncombatants it effectively enslaves the noncombatant race behind a wall of fear. This form of functional racial division of one race as only physical and the other only mental, is dehumanizing to both races. This unnatural imposition also sets the stage for a meta-psychological reaction against the unanswered outrages bound to follow in the wake of one race’s emasculation in the face of another race’s retributive entitlement.

The process of reaction is underway as ivory identitarians first whine like women about the need for paramilitary bully squads to protect them as sheepdogs protect sheep. Ultimately, since the sheepdog role must be filled only by state and increasingly corporate actors, the second wave of sissy backlash will express itself as an upwelling of wolfish behavior from the ghost sheeple. This benefits first government and then corporate hierarchies even more, as the ghost sheeple are far more numerous than the assigned criminal race and the need to protect the minority against a perceived majority will accrue more power to the protecting force as it will necessarily have to increase in size.

So it goes, even as each race sees the power elite as a structure which any race might be able to use against the other, the power elite sees the game more clearly as it plays one race off against the other. Ultimately the harnessing of racial emasculation as a behavioral trigger to generate violent action and reaction is at the core of the Civilized structure. For even among the soft scions of Civilization, the prospect that every man of a given race is born to sissydom will ultimately raise the ire of those not suited to the myth of their soft vulnerability and resentful of the myth of the indomitable masculinity of the OTHER, thus renewing the cycle of social discord.

In any society, a forceful man who will describe the typical member of an enemy people as enjoying menacing superiority akin to that of a timber wolf over a lap dog [this is the analogy that was made] has essentially whispered to the Old Gods that it is time for their cleansing thunder to sweep him and the lesser number of his into deserved eternity.

Ironically, the morning after viewing this podcast, I saw a daytime talk show, the entire staff of which was made up of guilty ivory women, assertive ebony women and sissy ebony men, cavorting, dancing, joking, gossiping betraying the actual fact that the so-called wolves of men pointed out by the ivory nationalist are in fact the companions of the women and children of his own pale race and that his abject fear of the ebon man is akin to the fear of poodles, not wolves.

The ivory race needs to be cleansed of its prissy, primping waste.

Masculinity

Biography