This video is another excellent dose of truth from the Canadian Socrates, concerning domestic violence in the U.S., Canada, and Britain. As you might have noticed Stefan is not a real physical guy and violence still freaks him out as much as it did when he was a kid. That’s a good thing in many ways. However, he lacks understanding of the dynamics of aggression as much as liberals misunderstand the economy. His medical sources do pinpoint the root causes, but as often as not he is left guessing at something he is not designed to fathom.

Stefan, in case you read this, what you have been developing an understanding of is the roots of the desire to do violence. Once that urge to harm is established in your economic primate, you then get to the action scale. Once a person has reasoned that a particular violent action is desirable, or has irrationally discovered the urge to commit said violent act due to his mother beating him every time he asked for wild berry Poptarts, he, she, it, or they will act on that impulse according to the following considerations which provide an intensity of action scale that works in either direction depending on whether or not it was a rational or irrational act:

1. Does the violent hopeful feel justified in committing the act, due to any number of supporting factors including chemical or social stimuli.

2. Does the violent hopeful have reason to believe they can succeed in inflicting the desired effect, either due to delusional state of mind, or after a considered and realistic prospectus forwarded to the head office by the Biomechanical Forensics Department?

3. If they care, do they have reason to believe they can avoid injury during the course of the violent act? In the case of modern women the answer is usually yes, as the man won’t pick a fight with a goon squad of cops just to ward off the poorly executed attack of his sperm repository.

4. If they care, will the act meet with peer approval or disapproval? The hierarchal approval aspect is next, and is the big one.

5. Does the violent hopeful have reason to believe that they will not be punished for their actions, whether by Latino vendetta, WASP State criminal charges, Hebrew law suit, Islamic suicide bomber, Capitalist drone, or a Christian evangelist showing up on their doorstep just as they fire up the bong? In the case of a savage psychobitch she can avoid all of the above repercussions so long as she does not use a knife or gun or produce a body, just by virtue of her gender—and the judicious application of oral sex if necessary.

Decisions made along this scale are heavily influence by witness-reliant trail procedure, enabling females and group attackers to lie effectively to shift blame to their victim. Also, the disparity of force case law that holds a pro boxer to a higher standard than an ordinary man, also works in favor of our more violent incubators of the next violent generation.