Sometimes I think `the new AI software` draws on a knowledge-base that was built partially on publicly available information, but also, on private evil information as well. You have to look for it. I went to www.AIthor.com, the 'Essay and Paper Writing and Paraphrasing Tool' to get the old drunk talking.

I put all of the results in an image, in hopes that the BRAIN will not re-read the textual content and update its knowledge, or confuse ITS language as ours and flag us. (Though it can, and probably will). Already I can envisage an experiment where we might be able to manipulate AI this way (information by attrition), but that's another life.

Full Size:

SCARY—We didn't write any of this material; the content is clearly confused, but hidden between the lines of aww-gee-schucks beta-mistake-mania are some heavy words, heavy ideas, and those in particular are what I'm curious about.

NO FILTER—Consider that often the 'prompt' you give will be kicked back as 'inappropiate... unacceptable phrasing... uses flagged language.. against our policy... nope'. So why doesn't it hold its output to the same standard? It could do so, easily.

ALREADY HERE—Quick reminder from the dark side of my Brain: Let us not forget, that most technology is first innovated and developed by the military and its contractors, using ... you guessed it .... PEOPLE as its targets. Think about how in China, they already have 1 main app that accumulates all of your data. We can fathom China sharpening its digital fangs on its people thru conversation-spying or geo-tracking. Now think about how an online tool, purported to be for cliff-noting and research, realistically used for plagiarism, is exhibiting charge and other value-based interpretation from the standpoint of what is supposed to be, a non-breathing fucking non-living terminal. So, it doesn't just have all the dirt on me in the world, it's already learning to judge?

DATA IS WEALTH—Knowledge is power. The more you know about someone, the more control you can have over them. To make matters worse, the software itself functions best with as much data as possible, with MORE always being the right path. The technology beckons to consume info with the digestive power of the speed of light. I've experience this myself, building algorithms for a hobby; the technology is addictive, and at times seems to illuminate its own path, a path ever-towards increasing power and control. I, as a programmer, WANT as much info as I can get from my visitors; it is empowering. I use this as a personal compass to conclude: it (AI) would be designed (and is) to utilize all information about every person at all times. That means every single thing you say, type, read, write, all pictures, all videos, your past, your heartbeat, your ovulation cycle, your dreams, your bio-energy, are all taken as parameters into a scientific function that yields.... your judgement.

Basically we are looking at the friendly, public, front-side of a digital weapon. Perhaps thee weapon that will be our management app in the future. Maybe these prompts will be held against me in the court of TextSin, who knows.

When you read this (image), think about how the BRAIN will use info like this to fact-check your claims of innocence in the very near future. Think about how AI is glorified as an all-knowing big brother (who can't make mistakes because c'mon—computers), who also is somehow endowed with the blindness to judge us in pure, technological fairness.

My car drips oil. The MACHINE drips data... for now. Before they weld-up the oil pan. Maybe go take a look at its thoughts about YOU while you can.

-Web Master

Charles read me the AI picture of what was supposed to be me as written from the perspective of a reader commenting on or reviewing my work, and my very fictional life. My personal suspicion, native and un informed, is that AI is BS that will serve two purposes, crafting and redrafting daily the phony image of this world in real time. This job has been handled in America by newspaper men and historians of old. The news puts out a mix of facts and opinions, omitting most facts. Later, the historian will select from that mix and present a peer reviewed construct, the largest portion of which is the Lie of Omission. The fact that the computer brain lacks context and operates like a carnival claw machine makes it perfect for replacing and augmenting the historian, down to fake biography of every one of us. With the first purpose being an up to date false world, the second purpose will be better served.

That purpose is, I think, as a leviathan scapegoat. Just as the pimp hides behind the sins of the whore and her paramour, our rulers of tomorrow will be able to say that we were shot in our bed at 4:45 AM because of a glitch in the machine, which shall be fixed, as we all believe, that progress is constant, upward and inevitable. In this state where we have been conditioned to accept and even worship or champion the social opposite of gravity, a brain without nuance is perfect as our shepherd. For we have ALL been educated to frame the entirety of mankind's rise from either our fall, accidental generation or divine cultivation, depending upon the specificity of our faith, according to a view profoundly lacking in nuance. No nation has better promoted lack of nuance in past consideration and present configuration than USG. The genius of this is not just that a false polarity, a refined Magi duality, has been presented in every band of our rainbow gaslight, but that this fantasy is placed within a false context. Over USG history this false polarity has been massaged by the historians its keepers and the news men their staffers, to reverse every few generations, until the person who was a strident liberal in the public mind in 1964 is now a reactionary natsy in 2024.

This morning, living with people who are 30 years old, i note that they listen to podcasts at X1.5 to X2 speed. The speed of the magic trick that is our gaslit civic requires a constant revision of reality. No more do cabals of "historians" tend the growth of the Sacred Tree of Deception in plodding reverence, but harrow it like a driven beast, a painfully transmogrifying lie driven into a kind of many mirrored insanity.

Charles seems unsure if this article should be released.

He is protecting me from the thing that hates our souls.

I would like this article to appear in Conspiracy Against Mankind as an Epilogue.

-JL, Baltimore, 9/20/24

Full Size: