Yesterday I was having a meal in a Pizza Hut with a nice highly educated white lady—not my normal cup of tea. But she was pretty so I made an exception to my ‘dumb slut’ dating rule and relaxed for a nice slice of pizza and salad. Then, just as our very attentive waiter left to put our order in, a clan of five large oppressed women and their three children began to rise from their table. A boy among the children was then ‘thumped’ by one of the beastly babes. Two of the other women gave her questioning looks as the teary eyed boy looked up at the giantesses with some hope of sympathy, which mamma nipped in the bud, “I birthed him, I’ll beat him!”
As the herd of chocolate matriarchs stampeded in their slouching way for the weight loss chute, my oh so dainty date looked at me with wide eyes and said, “Why?”
“The eugenics crowd will say that they are bred to be cruel, that it is all genetic. It’s not more complicated than that, just different. Cultural conditioning is very tenacious. Values, habits, behaviors are passed on very effectively by parents; particularly when parents have children at a young age when they are still impulsive themselves.”
She whispered, “Okay, stupid parents having stupid kids. I get that. But why? Why does it ever make sense to be cruel to a child like that?”
She cringed as I neglected to whisper. “These are agrarian behaviors with the same roots as marriage and slavery, namely animal husbandry and forced labor farming—upon which most systems of slavery, including current types of wage slavery and wage taxation, are based on.”
She shrugged and asked, “So people have always beaten their kids until recently?”
“There is no evidence for child beating among primitive hunter and gatherer societies. It all goes to the concept of ownership, and ownership is not even a strong ethos in primitive societies. The idea of ownership comes with settled living, and farming. The specific idea of ownership of other people emerges from breeding animals. Men first figured out fatherhood. Many primitives did not understand reproduction. Many women believed in sperm cocktails from numerous men with varying qualities so that the child would have multiple contributing fathers. Once men began breeding animals they developed marriage traditions to assert ownership over offspring.
“Until very recently children were legally the property of parents in this nation. In fact children are still property, but now of the State, who uses a kind of power sharing system with the parent as the junior partner; this being one reason why single parent families are preferred by the government. But people with recent agrarian roots—like all these blacks that migrated to Baltimore from the rural South in the 1950s—they still have this culturally ingrained concept of children as intrinsic family livestock. I know women who stay at home and send their boys out to commit crimes and work legit jobs and take all or most of their money.
“A man for most of agrarian history was the foreman of the slave gang that was his family and he had the right to hit, harm or kill. In Rome a patriarch could kill sons, daughters and wives at will. The wife tends to wield power over the children in the same vein. In a society like Black America where the biological father has traditionally been excluded as the mother is essentially married to the federal government, just as her great, great, great grandmother was the mistress of the slave master, the right to use force within the family structure has traditionally been hers.
“Men have largely been excluded from using violence against children as a byproduct of the institution of laws against wife beating. With the woman not conceived of as a target by the State, and the fact that she is beating people who have been taught they deserve it within a cohesive family structure—as opposed to a man beating his woman and hitting the streets in the traditional criminal fashion—she stays under the radar, and continues to assert property rights over her born slaves. This agrarian appreciation of children as livestock survives in child abuse and also in the habit of poor women from this historically recent tradition sending their boys out to work and commit crime on their behalf.”
She scrunched her pretty face in disgust and snarked, “Oh great, another generation of stupid people on the way.”
“You asked Baby. And the incubation factor is this: the style of puritanical policing called for by the Drug War insures that that entire segment of society is going to continue not to report internal crimes, least of all some bitch punching out her boy.”
She puffed up her cute cheeks and waved away the unhappy thoughts along with the steam coming off the just served bread sticks. “Oh happy days.”
Personally, as a Darwinist, I do not mind that the people who generally look upon me as an enemy based upon my skin color, and who condone their children committing crimes against me, beat their children, as it makes those children mentally weak and behaviorally predictable, further increasing my odds of survival.
Ah...a silver lining at the end.
So (and I might be a little slow here but...) are you saying Whites more chivalrous toward their wives and children because they are more evolved...have been doing less farm work? I'm not sure if I could find evidence to support this.
I have not seen much chivalry by white or black men toward women. I do know from experience that black women tend to be brutal parents, and publicly so, mostly to their boys. Abuse of women by men has always been higher among whites than blacks. Lately, the biggest trend I have noticed in Baltimore, is black women attacking black men in public. This might just be a matter of black women for whatever reason being comfortable publicly using violence, and white women doing it behind closed doors. However it is difficult to find blacks who have not been beaten by one or both parents, often with a belt. Most of these people are only a few generations removed from a rural life that was little different from the 19th century plight of blacks in the South. Virtually all the senior blacks I know moved up from Georgia or the Carolinas as children in the 50s or 60s.
I will be addressing this issue again in Tao of a Black Cracker, which should be up by 12/16/14, and will site this article in that piece.