Click to Subscribe
‘What About American Emasculation?’
A Man Question from Mescaline Franklin
© 2015 James LaFond
APR/16/15
Based on a phone conversation on March 31, 2015
“You’ve made some sharp points about how emasculations goes back to the beginning, to Eve and the Garden of Eden, that this feminism thing is the latest thread in this timeless tension between man and woman—the dance of the opposites. American, of course is the far western expression of the western experience—unless you want to count the Japanese, who are almost like an experiment gone wrong, imploding farther down the time line so we can see what soulless hell awaits us. You mention some things in your writing about the Native American influence in white American culture. Has that kept us from deteriorating as quickly as the Europeans, who seem like they’ll be entirely done outside of Switzerland in thirty years?”
The American Rifleman
Undoubtedly, the status as the U.S. combat infantryman from 1780 through the present day as the premier rifleman on the battlefield comes partially from the American Indian. Just like our Special Forces and SEALs train indigenous troops in other countries, the Brits used to hire the natives as military advisors to train white troops. It could be said that the Iberian campaign in 1809 was largely carried by light infantry tactics picked up in the Atlantic colonies, as well as the holding of the stronghold of Hugomonte at Waterloo in 1815.
In early Modern Europe you had a bare handful of game keepers and lords who did all hunting. The technology, however, was the product of the German gunsmith, who brought his trade to Pennsylvania, before it spread to New England and Virginia.
Hunting began with smoothbores, for which the stalking methods of the native bow hunter were well adapted. The smoothbore musket was such a poor weapon in terms of acquiring the target that windage and other concerns of the bow hunter were not as important as just getting as close as possible. The skills used by the American riflemen to hunt—often among the Indians—were then added to the Indian’s skill set and honed in war fighting. Then, as the frontier hunters fought back, they in turn honed these skills even farther, being better acquainted with the mechanical nature of the rifle and taking more liberties with the design. It was a give and take over 100 years of cultural exchange, warfare, and cross training. Ned Christie, a Cherokee rifleman, was perhaps the last of the Indian long hunters.
What some U.S. marksmen accomplished in WWII, taking on sniper roles with just plain Garand M-1 rifles, is a testament to this. The American rifleman from Wetzel, to York in WWI, to Murphy in WWII, to Mawhinney and Waldron in Vietnam, and since then the dedicated snipers, can trace the lineage of their art back to 1700s Pennsylvania.
American Emasculation, After Researching Relative Laws
While European emasculation has been driven by the age old lust for leisure among rich and poor and high and low, the deconstruction of the American man was more deliberate, specifically engineered by the ruling class. For anyone that thinks we were a nation of he-man who valued brawn 100 years ago I would like to cite the Gold Medal flour advertisement on the back of a 1917 National Geographic magazine. I forget which month it was. But it is the issue that had all of the world’s flags including the 100 plus nations Britain ruled!
The graphic was of a man of middle years built on the order of the British aristocrat—and this build was purposefully accentuated by the tailored clothing in order to showcase the lack of physical brawn, as physicality was the province of unlettered brutes and savages and the English aristocrat and his American imitator wished to be depicted as the effete puppet master of empire rather than a man of strength. In that age men of strength were nothing but beasts of burden, small industrial machines, their brawn eclipsed by the gun on the battlefield. [The 1926 movie Metropolis, well illustrates this opinion. There was a strong counter current in the more popular fiction of London, Burroughs and Howard, written for the working man, in which brawny protagonists based on wrestlers and boxers predominated.]
This narrow-shouldered punched fellow with his sway back is looking at a bag of white flour. The ad proclaims, in so many words, that he might as well try it now, for he will “eventually acquire the habit!” Please someone tell me this line was used for cigarette advertisements.
Having a look at the image of the man that Teddy Roosevelt did his best to put to rest, only to be laughed at by other members of the upper class and literary elite, I would like you to consider the deconstruction of the American man at the hands of his parasitic government.
1. Horace Mann of Massachusetts and Henry Barnard of Connecticut crusaded for free, compulsory school for every child in the nation, largely as a way of undermining Irish catholic culture. The catholics had their own schools. Massachusetts passed the first compulsory school laws in 1852. By 1918, all American children were required to attend at least elementary school, which completed the process of separating boys from their fathers and putting them under the supervision of women into adolescence, something that no primitive society ever did.
2. The Social Security Act of 1935 took the responsibility of caring for the elderly away from the family, further undermining the already eroding [under industrial pressure] extended family. [As bad as farming is compared to hunting for the upbringing of young men, it at least maintains the family unit. Industrialism was the creeping emasculatory force that underlies the entire erosion of masculinity in the west and is in no way unique to America.]
3. The Food Stamp Act of 1964, had the gradual effect of driving a quarter of American men out of the household as the women they impregnated chose marriage to Uncle Sam over marriage to a man, leaving roughly one quarter of American households fatherless. As the Social Security Act tolled the death knell for the extended American family household, the Food Stamp Act did so for the nuclear family.
4. Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, a civil rights law, ended up tying federal funds to the dispensing of behavioral modification drugs to children—primarily boys—diagnosed with attention deficit disorders, which used to be called ‘boys being boys.’ Ever since our boys have been increasingly drugged like middle aged women, by middle aged women, in order to make them more manageable for middle aged women. I’ve been intimate with a dozen middle aged women. And let me tell you, it takes decades of experience hearing workers’ grievances to be able to settle one of these broads down without her bowl of Prozac. It’s more than a 10 year old boy should have to deal with, let alone be drugged into tolerating. Heck, the poor tike does not yet have the option of the most tried and true solution, which is fucking her stupid and then lettering her hug you all night. The resulting drug dependency, not to mention the forced feminization, of the students has further eroded the primal ideal that young men should be behaviorally different than young women.
On top of these 4 huge legislative strokes I see political correctness and feminism as mere icing on the cake of national emasculation. The next big step will be a lowering of fitness standards for combat officer candidates in the military to permit the first female combat officers to graduate and command in the field, which will eventually result in a video of the rape and beheading of an American female on the internet, and the final emasculation of America.
Getting Laid Is Not The Problem
the man cave
In The Breech
eBook
uncle satan
eBook
cracker-boy
eBook
songs of arуas
eBook
predation
eBook
the gods of boxing
eBook
spqr
eBook
hate
eBook
the year the world took the z-pill
  Add a new comment below:
Name
Email
Message