People have asked me often, since the April Race Purge in Harm City, what the end game is.
I have been on the bus with blacks calling for race war.
I have watched friends of both races flee what they believe will be the scene of more riots, more purges.
Will there be a race war?
In other words, will whites actually fight back the next time they are hunted en masse on the streets of Baltimore?
Since the race purge is ongoing, and I have been singled out for attack by three different groups of young black men since the purge unofficially ended, there is no doubt that such activity will peak again.
Targets and thugs all believe now, that the police will be nowhere in sight the next time riots occur. The riot is the purge trigger. As soon as a riot occurs all police will rush to one, and only one, location, and Baltimore City and surrounding areas will be ripe for the purging again.
Another cop car is rushing down my street and another has its siren going on Harford Road.
Right now, as people in all black zones complain that they are getting no police protection—and they are not, for the black community rallied against police action repeatedly this year—the cops are actually, for the first time since I moved to Baltimore 35 years ago, waging an aggressive campaign against stick up boys, smash and grab robbers, muggers and home invaders. Their hands are full too, as the stupid mayor recently released over 700 convicted drug dealers [and these guys will need to do something for a living now that their corners have been taken by younger, more violent players] and, according to her war room 228 known shooters are loose on the streets of Baltimore.
More cop cars are speeding by in the rain.
All this said, we still have people getting robbed and beaten and businesses stuck up in this area every day, even with vigilant and responsive policing.
What happens when all of the police get pulled out?
When it happened before the criminals did not know ahead of time that the mayor was going to order a stand down, yet gangs of batters, and arson and door crashing crews were organized and ready to act as soon as night fell.
Although it is hard to imagine that that stupid bitch would order a stand down again, and it is clear from his actions, that the Governor would declare martial law and send in the guard and state troopers, there will still only be coverage in the area where the riots—planned by the criminals—will occur.
Purge #2 Prediction
Whenever it happens I expect the following.
More gang personnel will attack businesses and whites in outlying areas than did in the April 2015 Purge.
As in the previous purge, the police will not respond to any criminal activity outside of the riot zone, unless, whites fight back.
Lookout, if a white fights back effectively, or if more than one or two isolated white men stand their ground and cause the hoodrat hordes to take losses, the hoodrats will call in the police, and they will come.
I will bank on that prediction.
In my opinion, the federal end game here, and the reason why the DOJ has encouraged and supported race riots and declined to investigate the race purges, is because the Feds want the unchecked rampaging of the criminal element of the inner city to force white gun owners to defend themselves, giving the government a chance to step in and disarm the entire population, or at least prosecute landmark “vigilante” cases against citizens. In my neighborhood we had two white men use guns to face down mobs of armed blacks. If one of these men face more aggressive mobs and shoot an innocent, unarmed, bat-wielding, gas-can totting youth, then we will have yet another white on black race crime against the Children of the State, which will be like throwing kerosene on the racial flames—and that device in the corner is not a fire extinguisher but a news camera, designed to feed the flames of civil unrest in order to better serve our masters’ will.
Our Governor in Maryland has an itchy trigger finger when it comes to using the National Guard, and I expect him, or ultimately a successor placed in the same media-created federally sanctioned situation, to use the guard, ultimately, to disarm the population.
That’s just my opinion.
Caveat: if no whites defend themselves as a unit, or with firearms, the State hammer will not come down.
I concur James. Gun confiscation in the wake of civil unrest is especially likely to happen in the blue states. The red states are another matter. The Woman (our Leftist ruling elite) thinks private gun ownership is nothing but a dangerous nuisance. She thinks guns in the hands of white rednecks are a worse problem than guns in the hands of black criminals. Naturally she is constantly looking for any excuse to force the white folks to turn in their guns. Keep in mind that our President continually refers to the "Australian" solution to gun violence (i.e. massive gun confiscation). Also (for those readers who are not Maryland residents) be aware that legally owned handguns in Maryland are all registered so the authorities already know who has them and where they are.
James, what do you think would be your state government's response if white people limited themselves to fighting back just with clubs, edged weapons, and sling shots? What if the white people joined together and formed the "shield wall" to protect their neighborhoods? What might happen then? I suppose that might be a forlorn hope since white Americans are no longer accustomed to showing such racial solidarity, even in the face of aggression, as other ethnic groups are. Plus The Woman is liable to decide that whites banding together is UN-PC and therefore unacceptable under any circumstances and move forcefully against them regardless of what a rules of engagement they imposed on themselves. But anyway, what's your take on it?
"What if the white people joined together and formed the "shield wall" to protect their neighborhoods? What might happen then? I suppose that might be a forlorn hope since white Americans are no longer accustomed to showing such racial solidarity, even in the face of aggression, as other ethnic groups are. Plus The Woman is liable to decide that whites banding together is UN-PC and therefore unacceptable under any circumstances and move forcefully against them regardless of what a rules of engagement they imposed on themselves. But anyway, what's your take on it? "
Whites never stick together. THey are far more likely to attack other whites for sticking up for themselves. I've had this happen. The Woman is just the governmental manifestation of the white liberal consciousness.
Any whites who defended their neighborhoods even with their bare hands will be targeted by the media and then the DA as Great White Defendants (see: Bonfire of the Vanities).
I think most whites will continue to pretend the government is on their side and we must continue to pay Danegeld to the black hordes until some systemic shock reduces our wealth to the point where we are no longer comfortable with our yuppie existences. Then again, men tolerate tyranny for centuries, so who knows?
OK. Thanks much for the Info PR. Yes, we are engaged in a low intensity civil war between the Good-Whites” and the “Bad-Whites”, as John Derbyshire characterizes it, are we not? As you say, The Woman is the “governmental manifestation of the white liberal consciousness”. The Woman turns the hopes, beliefs, desires, fears, prejudices and hatreds of the Good-Whites into government policy. To the Good-Whites the Bad-Whites have absolutely NO justification for sticking up for themselves. Rather they MUST accept the punishment meted out for them by The Woman, her white SJWs and her oppressed non-white minions. Hence the “Great White Defendant” syndrome you mention. Liberal DA’s in the major metropolitan jurisdictions have trouble reconciling in their own minds the fact that they spend the over-whelming majority of their time and efforts prosecuting non-white criminals, and for pretty banal and depraved crimes too. This just doesn’t fit the Cultural Marxist (AKA PC) narrative. Therefore these Lefty Urban DAs will jump at any chance to prosecute a white man, especially a Conservative one and /or one of property. Well that is the answer to how it will ultimately go down then: the ethnic cleansing of Baltimore will continue until all whites are driven out of the city. Of course the tax revenue that the city government needs to operate will go with the whites (eventually necessitating state and federal government bailouts). But one must keep in mind that Leftist policies are frequently contradictory and counter-productive to even the Leftist’s own declared ends.
At this point I recommend that the white people of Baltimore petition President Putin for assistance. President Putin has publically declared that Russia will come to the aid of persecuted Christians around the world. christianpost.com/news/vladimir-putin-vows-to-defend-christianity-worldwide-69002 Clearly your government is unwilling to protect the lives, liberty and property of its white citizens against assailants motivated by racial hatred. Particularly those whites who are not politically connected and under the protection of The Woman (i.e. the Good-Whites).Your government will not even allow you to defend yourselves, as James as well others have pointed out time and again. It is also clear that the U.S. Department of Justice / Federal Government is not unbiased and has taken sides against Christian whites in this conflict. Therefore calling on another Christian nation for assistance in protecting your basic human rights is not irrational or unpatriotic. At the very least Russia could send observers and investigators to ensure that Conservative Christian whites in Baltimore are receiving equal protection under the law. I think such a request might serve to “raise public consciousness” on the matter. Not to mention get someone their “15 minutes of fame”. Who knows but that such an unusual request might even inspire Republicans to get involved and act like a real opposition party for a change?
“The duty of a true patriot is to protect his country from its government.”- Thomas Paine