Prince William recently sounded a warning about human population growth, mentioning, that Britain’s population will explode to 70 million by 2029 (largely due, I observe, to non-White immigration), but he also mentioned the elephant in the room, Africa’s population expansion:

“In my lifetime, we have seen global wildlife populations decline by over half,” he said. “We are going to have to work much harder, and think much deeper, if we are to ensure that human beings and the other species of animal with which we share this planet can continue to co-exist.

“Africa’s rapidly growing human population is predicted to more than double by 2050 – a staggering increase of three and a half million people per month. There is no question that this increase puts wildlife and habitat under enormous pressure. Urbanization, infrastructure development, cultivation – all good things in themselves, but they will have a terrible impact unless we begin to plan and to take measures now.”

His solutions included voluntary family limitation, which is only a paper solution because the demographic momentum is already in the population system, and how is that proposal to work anyway, when religion (mainly Islam), and tradition weighs against it?

This problem of demographics and survival has been debated at “American Renaissance,” in I believe a most unsatisfactory way:

The short of the long here is that the standard conservative solutions are rolled out such as foreign aid for birth control, to embracing Australia’s “stop the boats” proposal. There are essays embedded in the list recognizing that even these modest goals will be hard to achieve given the Establishment’s embrace of the religion of immigration and diversity, and that this is the ruling ideology of the age.

The effects of Islamic immigration on Europe, as documented by almost daily articles at sites like Breitbart.com, is that much of Western Europe has already been made into a warzone, so what will it be like when these forces are multiplied by infinity, with the possibility of billions of Africans seeking to enter Europe to escaper the ecological devastation of Africa?

I do not see conservatives like those who present at “American Renaissance” as fully aware of the ecological threats that rising human population numbers will pose to an already damaged ecosystem, and that is to argue on the basis that global warming and peak oil are complete hoaxes. If we are wrong about this, and sane people always need to recognise the possibility of being in error, then this makes the crisis even worse.

Even nations like Australia are in ecological trouble due to simple things like lack of water for a relatively massive population explosion, all due to the elites wanting to make fast bucks from immigration, while at the same time ethno-racially/demographically destroying Anglo-Australia. Australia’s population growth is 30 years ahead of schedule, with an insane net arrival rate of far in excess of 200,000 per year, in the driest continent on Earth:

All in the midst of economic decline:

These converging and compounding crises are set to undermine world civilisation. There may be nothing much left for the “American Renaissance” crowd to whinge about, and even East Asians, their heroes with IQs off the scale, still need to eat and drink, and are not immune to radioactive fallout which will contaminate the world, when finally TSHTF. These suit-and-tie types really can’t get their heads around the idea that this time, our number may be up, and we are just another species whose time for extinction has come.